Legal Opinion

Anthony Clay v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2015No. ED101831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobert M. Clayton Iii, Presiding Judge

Anthony Clay (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Movant was charged with and convicted of ten sexual offenses where his stepdaughter was the victim (“Victim”). Those offenses consisted of three counts of first-degree statutory rape, three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, two counts of first-degree child molestation, one count of second-degree statutory sodomy, and one count of incest.

A. The Evidence Adduced at Trial

The following evidence was adduced at Movant’s jury trial.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Glass v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Justin Bonds, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API