Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1983No. 828DC250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Though seven questions are presented, based on twenty-seven assignments of error and more than one hundred exceptions, they all can be resolved by examining and interpreting the separation agreement that is the basis for the counterclaim and the rules of evidence whereunder opinion testimony as to value is permissible. In doing so, it becomes clear that the trial below was conducted without prejudicial error to the plaintiff.

First of all, the plaintiffs contention that the separation agreement — (which forbade the defendant to enter her premises without receiving her written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Edwards v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Bost v. BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Brown Chemical Co. v. Atkinson, Cobb & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Harrelson v. . GoodenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. BusbyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
  2. Howard v. Iomaxis, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API