Legal Opinion

Victor Auto Parts, Inc. v. Cuva

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David O. Boehm, J.

Is an assumed name, under which someone does business, a separate entity for purposes of legal process? Strangely, given the many years that businesses have operated under assumed names, no guidance is offered in case law or legal treatises whether a corporation doing business under an assumed name must be designated and served in its corporate name, or whether it is sufficient to name and serve it under its assumed name.

*350The question arises out of the attempt by the petitioner, Victor Auto Parts, to collect upon its judgment against one of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fiorella v. Buffalo Park Lane Restaurant, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Vista Sales Corp. v. Briggsford Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  3. Vista Sales Corp. v. Briggsford Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogan v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Toulousaine de Distribution et de Services v. Tri-State Seed & GrainNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. TOULOUSAINE De DIST. v. TRI-STATE SEEDNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API