Gray v. Hall, Corning & Doane
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Rice District Court. At the January Term, 1882, of the district court, plaintiffs Hall, Corning & Doane had judgment for $269.63 against defendant Gray, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Action by Hall, Corning & Doane as plaintiffs, to recover of Gray $500 as damages for breach of *705contract in failing to deliver to plaintiffs a quantity of corn. The action was tried at the January term for 1882, by the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs for $269.63. Gray excepted, and brings the case here.
Several errors are alleged, but many of them are so trifling that it is unnecessary to refer to them. We will notice those only which seem to demand attention. The petition alleged, inter alia, that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Burrell v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Stewart v. PowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. DirksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Boyer v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1892