Legal Opinion · Dissent

Browning v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 16, 1975No. 7 Div. 409Published

1DissentDeCARLO, Judge

The reversal of the judgment denying the coram nobis petition is based on the fact that appointed counsel was not afforded a sufficient time to prepare appellant’s case. In accordance with this reason the majority said the failure to grant the continuance necessitated this post conviction relief.

Of course the matter of a continuance is addressed to the trial court’s discretion and is only subject to review upon a showing of abuse. Ballard v. State, 51 Ala.App. 393, 286 So.2d 68.

The original opinion, Browning v. State, 51 Ala.App. 632, 288 So.2d 170, was written by Judge Leigh Clark,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Divine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Browning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Braswell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API