Thomas v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 72 — MOTION IN COURT OP APPEALS MOTION, IN APPEAL PROM ROWAN CIRCUIT COURT, TO HAVE WIFE’S ATTORNEY’S PEE TAXED AGAINST THE HUSBAND — MOTION OVERRULED. CITED 7 B. Monroe, 459-60, Billings v. Pilcher & Hauser. 8 Metcalfe, 303, Meyar v. Meyar. 2 Metcalfe, 412, Ballard v. Caperton. 18 B. Monroe, 517, Williams v. Monroe. Revised Statutes, section 32, chapter 25, 1 Stanton, 292.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered the opinion op the court.
In May, 1870, a judgment was rendered by the Bo wan Circuit Court divorcing Elizabeth J. Thomas from her hus*666band, Andrew J. Thomas, and allowing to her the care and custody of their infant child, Lydia Ellen Thomas; and said A. J. Thomas having prosecuted an appeal from that judgment, it was affirmed by this court in January, 1871.
This motion has since been instituted by the appellee that the court instruct the clerk, in taxing the costs against the appellant, to include therein a reasonable sum, to be fixed by the court, for her attorney’s fee…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Wills v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Wilkerson v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Thielmeier v. ThielmeierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.