Legal Opinion
Lublin v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 16, 1987No. Claim No. 72969PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
The question of whether the State of New York may be held liable in damages for the improper release of prisoners on parole has recently been resolved by the Court of Appeals. (Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511.) We are now confronted with the reverse, namely, whether a cause of action for false imprisonment will lie in the Court of Claims for improper revocation of parole.
*420Allen Lublin seeks a pecuniary award for his incarceration following what he contends to have been an illegal parole revocation hearing. His papers document various alleged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tarter v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People ex rel. Piccarillo v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Heisler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Earl W. Jimerson Housing Co. v. ButlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Stoudymire v. N.Y.S. Division of Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Semkus v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Bertoldi v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1995
- GREEN, SHAWN v. STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.