Legal Opinion

Baron v. Leo Feist, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1946No. Civ. 30-112PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant Leo Feist, Inc., has propounded written interrogatories to three witnesses in Trinidad. Under Rule 31(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A. following section 723c, plaintiff may within 10 days after receipt of these direct interrogatories serve cross-interrogatories on defendant.

Plaintiff, on this application seeks to deviate from this rule and requests the court for leave to serve cross-interrogatories after the receipt of the answers to the direct interrogatories.

This is a copyright infringement suit and the interrogatories propounded by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wheeler v. West India S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API