Legal Opinion

Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal frozn the assessment of the plaintiffs’ tax of 1879. Facts found by referees.

1Opinion of the CourtDob, C. J.

The unconstitutionality of unequal taxation is too plainly declared by our constitution, and too well settled by repeated decisions made during the last fifty-three years, to be debatable. A disproportional, unequal assessment, so far as it is disproportional and unequal, is an act, not of taxation, but of confiscation, destitute of that element of equal rights which, under our constitution, is an essential part of the definition of law. “ Equality is the corner-stone of every just and wholesome system of taxation. Every departure from this principle, no matter what the pretext may be, shifts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Gilman v. City of SheboyganSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Shotwell v. Sedam's HeirsOhio Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
  2. State v. U. S. & Canada Express Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
  3. Rollins v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  4. Conner v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API