Legal Opinion · Dissent
Robinson v. Nunly
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2011No. 46,053-CAPublished
1DissentMoore, J.
hi respectfully dissent. I cannot subscribe to the majority’s dismissal of the district court’s factual findings, its expansive reading of Art. 2004, or its reliance on nonexistent evidence and faulty inferences.
The majority concedes that when the plaintiff fails to object to it, the court may consider evidence offered at the trial of the exception of no cause of action. City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), 739 So.2d 748; Gipson v. Fortune, 45,201 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/27/10), 30 So.3d 1076, writ denied, 2010-0432 (La.4/30/10), 34 So.3d 298. Here, the plaintiffs failed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State MuseumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Middle Tennessee Council, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Scientific Drilling Int'l v. Meche, 2010-0511 (La. 4/30/10)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.