Weinfeld v. Knickerbocker Village, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The question presented is whether plaintiff, as Commissioner of Housing of the State of New York, has authority to compel defendant, a limited dividend housing corporation organized prior to July 1, 1939, to renew a lease. Concededly, the tenant meets the requirements for occupancy in a public housing project, and the refusal of defendant to renew was not predicated upon any discrimination because of race, color, creed or religion.
*384Defendant is a public limited dividend housing corporation formed in 1933 pursuant to the provisions of the State Housing Law (Laws of 1926, chap. 823). A total…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Lyons v. PrinceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davidson v. City of ElmiraNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Fruhling v. Amalgamated Housing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Weinfeld v. Hillside Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Knickerbocker Village, Inc. v. LackowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947
- Knickerbocker Village, Inc. v. GreifCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947