Legal Opinion

Max Finkel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 21, 1961No. 5863_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.

Taxpayer, who has been in the fish business for many years, was a stockholder in a fish meal corporation, New Bedford Fish Products Corporation, hereinafter Products, and in a fish trucking concern, Meso, Inc. Fish meal processing is a potential nuisance, and Products held the required municipal license. In 1952 its plant was temporarily shut down because business became unprofitable. In 1956 it was sold. Because the license was not transferable, the purchaser could not simply buy the assets, but required the stock. Prior to the sale, taxpayer had loaned $42,874 to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O. D. Bratton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Levy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Von Hoffman Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  5. Estate of Harry M. Liggett, Deceased Lucille W. Liggett, and Lucille W. Liggett v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roth Steel Tube Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API