Latham v. Harby
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Benet, J., Sumter, November, 1896. Action by^Samuel B. Batham against Horace Harby on following complaint: I. That heretofore the plaintiff and the defendant formed a copartnership under the firm name of Harby & Batham, for the purpose of buying and selling mules and horses, with their principal place of business at Camden, in said State, under an agreement that the defendant would procure and furnish the mules and horses for said business, and that the plaintiff…
Read the full summary
Before Benet, J., Sumter, November, 1896. Action by^Samuel B. Batham against Horace Harby on following complaint: I. That heretofore the plaintiff and the defendant formed a copartnership under the firm name of Harby & Batham, for the purpose of buying and selling mules and horses, with their principal place of business at Camden, in said State, under an agreement that the defendant would procure and furnish the mules and horses for said business, and that the plaintiff would manage and conduct the same; and that the defendant should be repaid the money expended for said mules and horses, and…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The view which the Court takes of this case will render it necessary to set out in the report thereof, the complaint, the answer (except the third defense, which was withdrawn without objection), the report of the master (except the items making up the result in the statement of receipts and expenditures of account), the exceptions to the said report, the decree of his Honor, the presiding Judge, and the exceptions to the said decree.
*443The following statement appears in the case: “This case was pressed on for trial by the plaintiff’s…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lancaster v. Southern Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Ross Tin Mine v. Cherokee Tin Mining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Huffman v. OwingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Rutland v. PaullingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Malcolm Mercantile Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915