Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coon v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1944No. 31345Published

1DissentRiley, J.

The bond which the sureties voluntarily signed and by virtue of which the defendant in the original case was released from custody recited that the charge preferred against the defendant was for the offense of perjury. Davis v. State, 112 Okla. 298, 240 P. 1069. The terms and conditions of the bond were that defendant was bound to answer to the district court. This he failed to do. In Manning v. State ex rel. Williams, 190 Okla. 427, 122 P. 2d 987, this court held a surety in such a case was liable on a bond taken before preliminary hearing.

It is thought the bond was a valid instrument…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Davis v. State Ex Rel. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Manning v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API