Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hearn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 2010No. AP-76,237PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.

Applicant, Yokamon Laneal Hearn, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In this subsequent application for habeas corpus, applicant asserts that he is mentally retarded and, pursuant to the United States Supreme Court holding in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), constitutionally exempt from a death sentence.

In our statutes and case law, “mental retardation” is defined by: (1) significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning; (2) accompanied by related limitations in adaptive functioning; (3) the onset of which occurs…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Gallo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Ex Parte BlueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Ex Parte Van AlstyneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carl Blue v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re: Eric CatheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Juan Segundo v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Robert CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Robert Ladd v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API