Benage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. (Loyeridge, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the majority opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff’s intestate, Jacob Gee, was a brakeman in the employ of the defendant company, which owned and operated a side track crossing the Kalamazoo river in the village of Otsego. This side track was placed across the'river by the company for the purpose of running its ■cars from the main line to the Bardeen paper mill, to transfer from the mill its manufactured product. It was built upon a trestle, and in a circular form, until it reached the manufacturing plant. Across the river from the main line the Bardeen Paper Company had erected gates across the track, just at the edge of the river.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glover v. ScottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Milbourne v. Arnold Electric Power Station Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Dolstrom v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Meyers v. Detroit & Charlevoix RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Milbourne v. Arnold Electric Power Station Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Phelps v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899