Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wendler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 5, 1968No. 43114PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quiluian, Judge.

The defendant contends under the ruling of State Farm Mut. &c. Ins. Co. v. Wendler, 115 Ga. App. 452, supra, that the insured must tell her insurer the complete truth concerning the accident and must stick to this truthful version throughout the proceedings; that she must not cripple her insurer in the defense of the suit by switching from one version of the occurrence to another. Thus, because the defendant introduced evidence showing a material variation in her testimony on the trial from that given in a prior written statement, every material issue in the case was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Childers v. Ackerman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. H. Y. Akers & Sons, Inc. v. St. Louis Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Hurston v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ProudfootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. KHD Deutz of America Corp. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API