Moseley v. Farrell
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Brazos. The ease was tried before Hon. John A. Buckholts, one of the district judges. The only point in the ease is stated with sufficient terseness by the chief justice. The question of jurisdiction was not raised in the court below, unless it was by general demurrer. There was no assignment of errors.
1Opinion of the Court
Morrill, G. J.
—The note sued on was due 24th June, 1862,
Galling for---------------------------------------$116 66
Interest to 24th October, 1868, at 10 per cent---- 38 86
155 52
Paid 24th October, 1865-------------------------- 25 00
Balance due-----------------1--------------------$130 52
This calculation shows that the district court had jurisdiction when the suit was brought. There is no error. The appeal was evidently taken for delay.
Judgment affirmed with damages.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. AtchisonTexas Supreme Court · 1873