Legal Opinion

Lloyd-Smith v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1930No. J-390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue allowed the refund for 1919 on March 6, 1924, under section 1324 of the Revenue Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 316). Girard Trust Co. v. United States, 270 U. S. 163, 46 S. Ct. 229, 70 L. Ed. 524. This refund resulted from an audit by the Commissioner of the original return filed by the corporation and the amended return filed by the receiver. At the time of the allowance of refund, the Commissioner determined that no interest was payable thereon under the above-mentioned section, inasmuch as no claim for refund had been filed.

We are of opinion,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Girard Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Parish & Bingham Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cambridge Loan & Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Johnston v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. American Potash Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Columbia Steel & Shafting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API