Legal Opinion

Phillip R. Conrad v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2017No. 2017-SC-000107-MRUnknownCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON.

A circuit court jury convicted Phillip Conrad of first-degree trafficking in a controlled substance over 2 grams, and of being a first-degree persistent felony offender. The jury recommended a twenty-year prison sentence, which the trial court imposed in its final judgment.

Conrad appeals the judgment as a matter of right. 1 He contends the trial court erred by: (1) allowing a detective to give prejudicial testimony, (2) giving faulty penalty-phase jury instructions producing a flawed sentence, (3) allowing improper evidence in the penalty phase, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Skaggs v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. ReneerKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Padgett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. King v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Cummings v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Shively v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Aaron Tussey v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  5. Adam Lloyd Grubb v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API