Legal Opinion

Peter v. Fullen

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1939No. Civ. No. 2370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J. —

This is a motion on behalf of respondent and cross-complainant Alice M. Fullen, based on an amended notice of motion duly served upon appellant, to dismiss the appeal. The motion is predicated upon the grounds that the transcript has not been filed within the prescribed statutory time, and that the notice of appeal did not contain any request that a transcript be made up and prepared, and that no request was ever made to the clerk of the court in which the action was brought to make up and prepare the transcript, and that no proceeding for a bill of exceptions or for a transcript…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broderick v. Majestic Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Harris v. McElligottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API