O'Brien v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is a petition to establish the truth of exceptions alleged to have been taken by the Boston Elevated Railway Company in two actions against it by James O’Brien and Timothy O’Brien. The petition was referred to a commissioner, whose report forms the basis of this judgment.
1. The regularity of a peremptory challenge to a juror was questioned. Twelve jurymen had been called to take their seats in the usual way. The plaintiffs challenged one, whose place was filled by calling another. The clerk then asked the defendant to exercise its right of challenge, and the defendant challenged one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamoureux v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Commonwealth v. BrownellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Clemens Electrical Manufacturing Co. v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Commonwealth v. MaddocksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Freeman v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Moneyweight Scale Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- O'Neill v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Rock v. RockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.