Legal Opinion

State v. Lytsell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 2003No. CR98-1809; A107800PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*171EDMONDS, P. J.

Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion affirming his convictions for robbery and kidnapping. State v. Lytsell, 184 Or App 75, 55 P3d 503 (2002). We allow the petition, withdraw our former opinion, and reverse those convictions.1

We restate the facts as we described them in our previous opinion:

“Defendant and two other men, Sandborn and Clippinger, burglarized the home of the victim, Fornataro, on the evening of January 5, 1998. While the three intruders were inside the house, Fornataro and his son returned home. Fornataro testified that he became suspicious…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. JoslinOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ThomaOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Cazares-Mendez/Reyes-SanchezOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. Cazares-MendezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. Edwards-PeecherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API