Legal Opinion

Dornan Bros. v. Benham Furniture Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Doman Bros, brought this action of replevin against the Benham Furniture Company *304to recover the possession of a large lot of carpeting. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, fixed the value of the goods delivered to the plaintiffs under the writ at $595, and assessed no damages. Upon this verdict judgment was entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs and the sureties on the replevin bond for $595, the value of the goods, and $148.75 interest thereon from the service of the writ, making in all $743.75. The judgment recited upon its face that the recovery of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. ClagettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Leach v. RichTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API