Legal Opinion

Federal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hanks

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Chief Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether an automobile owned by the insured but out of service being repaired at the time the automobile liability insurance policy issued, and which was later placed in service in place of the insured automobile, is within the coverage provided in the policy for a “newly acquired automobile.”

Petitioner, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, was held to be obligated to pay judgment secured by Charles D. Biggers, James D. Osborne, and W. T. Osborne against respondents, Marshall Hanks, and the Estate of German J. Hanks, deceased, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mahaffey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Manns v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Co. of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rogers v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Direct Insurance Co. v. George BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API