Green v. Southern California Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
Under the view which we take of these two cases, they may be considered and determined in one opinion.
Betsey Warren and her daughter,Mrs. Green, both women of mature age, and in possession of all their natural senses and faculties, and of good intelligence, were traveling in a small market-wagon drawn by' one horse, and when crossing the railroad track of defendant at C Street, in the city of San Bernardino, a collision occurred with a moving train of defendant, by which Mrs. Warren was injured and Mrs. Green killed. No. 951 is an action by Mrs. Warren and her husband to recover damages for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
- Flemming v. W. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1874
- Pepper v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Koch v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Gregg v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.