Denkmann Associates v. International Paper Co.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO JOIN AN INDISPENSABLE PARTY AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether IP Timberlands Operating Company, Ltd. (IPTO) is a party “needed for just adjudication” under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and if so, whether the action should be dismissed because the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction under Carden v. Arkoma Associates, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1015, 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990). The Court finds that IPTO is a party “needed for just adjudication” of the issues involved in this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- IP TIMBERLANDS OPERATING CO. LTD. v. DenmissMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- IP Timberlands Oper Co Ltd v. Denmiss CorpMississippi Supreme Court · 1996