Legal Opinion

Chichester v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1941No. 6 Div. 888Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

In deference to the earnestness of counsel for appellant on application for rehearing we have given careful consideration to the following authorities: Janes v. Fitchburg R. Co., 50 Hun 310, 3 N.Y.S. 165; Hottell v. Kemp, 139 Kan. 239, 31 P.2d 64; Hine v. Myrick, 60 Minn. 518, 62 N.W. 1125 and Watson v. Smith, 60 Minn. 206, 62 N.W. 265.

The case of Janes v. Fitchburg R. Co., supra, deals with the construction of a statute and that of Hottell v. Kemp, supra, merely places an interpretation upon a contract between the parties gathered from the writings and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hine v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Hottell v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Janes v. Fitchburg R. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Watson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API