Legal Opinion

Ronald J. Speltz June M. Speltz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2006No. 05-3054PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Ronald and June Speltz (“Taxpayers”) incurred substantial tax liability under the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) after exercising an incentive stock option. After the time of exercise, the stock value greatly declined. However, the tax liability remained. Taxpayers paid a portion of their tax liability and later made an offer-in-compromise (“OIC”) to settle the balance. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rejected the OIC. Taxpayers then appealed to the United States Tax Court, which granted summary judgment to the IRS. We affirm.

I. Background

Ronald Speltz…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Keith Orum and Cherie Orum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Olsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  2. Vinatieri v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  3. Pagonis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Fifty Below Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Catlow v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API