Ronald J. Speltz June M. Speltz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Ronald and June Speltz (“Taxpayers”) incurred substantial tax liability under the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) after exercising an incentive stock option. After the time of exercise, the stock value greatly declined. However, the tax liability remained. Taxpayers paid a portion of their tax liability and later made an offer-in-compromise (“OIC”) to settle the balance. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rejected the OIC. Taxpayers then appealed to the United States Tax Court, which granted summary judgment to the IRS. We affirm.
I. Background
Ronald Speltz…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Keith Orum and Cherie Orum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Olsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
3Cited by53 opinions
- Montgomery v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Vinatieri v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Pagonis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Fifty Below Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Catlow v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.