Legal Opinion

LaSalle v. Hilgermann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

In the course of the proceedings in the administration of the estate of Otto A. Hilgermann, who died May 2, 1927, an issue was first raised on September 7, 1927, on behalf of Frieda Hilgermann, the widow of the deceased, as to the validity of an antenuptial agreement which was entered into between her and the deceased on January 22, 1917, in the state of Illinois. After her husband’s death she had removed to that state, and there retained counsel who contend that the antenuptial agreement is invalid. Since they first raised that issue, her attorneys have filed nineteen voluminous petitions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Beck v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Boutin v. CatlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Mellor v. HeggatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Colla v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BlahnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Korleski v. Estate of KorleskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Loewenbach v. LoewenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API