Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 5, 2017No. SC 95707PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul C. Wilson, Judge

-Robert Hurst, on behalf of a class of similarly situated plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”), sued Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”) for violations of sections 407.010 to 407.130,1 commonly known as the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (“MMPA”), based on alleged misrepresentations concerning the- dashboards in certain Nissan Infinity FX vehicles. Following a jury, trial, the trial court entered judgment requiring Nissan to pay $2,000 in damages to each •class member identified in.a claims process and $1.9 million in attorney fees. Nissan appealed. This Court granted transfer and has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. OlsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Hope v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Carrier Corp. v. Royale Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cathy Hartney, Jennifer Romolo, Kristin Johnson, Ashley Levernez, Debra Flaska, Pratibha Prince, Ashleigh Bohlman, and Vincenta Wolfe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Zoetis, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  2. Murphy v. Rigdon, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API