Legal Opinion

Baron Corp. v. Piedmont Fire Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 16, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff had the burden of showing its alleged fire damage. The only evidence of the cause of the alleged fire, charring or burning of electric wiring, was that of an overload of electrical current.

The burning or charring of a wire carrying electric current occurring during or accompanying an overload of current must be regarded as an electrical injury, especially when, as here, there is an absence of evidence showing such burning or charring to be fire as distinguished, if that can be, from electrical injury.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for defendants,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance Corp. of New York v. Electrical District No. 4Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Sachs v. American Central InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Sidehill Corp. v. Glens Falls Insurance, New York County Courts1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API