Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Nottingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1988No. 86-1473PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The primary issue in this petition for mandamus is whether a leasehold interest in real property is considered real or personal property. Specifically, the question is whether the proper venue of an action in which a leasehold interest is the primary subject of the controversy is solely in the county where the leased property is located.

Petitioner asks us to direct the trial judge to withdraw and vacate his order transferring this case from Dale to Coffee County.

FACTS

On December 26, 1984, respondent C.H. B., Inc., an Alabama corporation doing business in both Dale and Coffee Counties, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Medical Service Administration v. DickersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Associated Grocers of Alabama v. Graves Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips of Fairfax, Inc. v. Chillum Terrace Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Tracy v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. Coosa Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API