Legal Opinion

State v. Marr

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 9, 1996No. 164PA94PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant was convicted as an accessory before the fact of the crimes charged. An accessory before the fact is guilty and punishable as a principal to the felony. N.C.G.S. § 14-5.2 (1993). An- accessory before the fact is one who is absent from the scene when the crime is committed but who procures, counsels, commands, or encourages the principal to commit it. State v. Benton, 276 N.C. 641, 174 S.E.2d 793 (1970). The action of a person accused of being an accessory before the fact must have caused the principal to commit the crime before the alleged accessory may be found…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HargettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State of West Virginia v. Gina Marie JerromeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API