Legal Opinion
Abergel v. Santander Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 2019No. 1:19-cv-06535Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ISAAC MIKE ABERGEL, Plaintiff, 19-CV-6535 (CM) -against- ORDER TO AMEND SANTANDER BANK, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. He alleges that he faced “fraudulent charges after I.D. theft.” By order dated August 19, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. STANDARD…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Hill v. CurcioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.