Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

We find ourselves unable to concur in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice ADAMS when the case was referred to him to write and which opinion will be filed as a dissenting opinion.

Mr. Justice ADAMS has stated certain salient facts which we shall not repeat here.

We are impelled to note the fact that in preparing brief the appellant has disregarded Rule 20 in many respects and especially that part of said Rule as to statement of questions involved. However, as we glean from the brief and record, a number of contentions were presented by the motion for new trial and by the assignments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Labarbara v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Feldman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Peak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Bailey v. StoutamireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API