Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Clark

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1923No. 3963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. It lias been held: “If a defendant be found guilty of more than one offense, and the imprisonment under one sentence is to commence at the expiration of the other, the sentences must so state; else the second punishment will be executed concurrently, and the defendant will be discharged on the expiration of. the longer term. Fortson v. Elbert County, 117 Ga. 149 (43 S. E. 492).” Shamblin v. Penn, 148 Ga. 592 (97 S. E. 520). See also Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co., 117 Ga. 305 (8) (43 S. E. 780, 61 L. R. A. 739) ; 16 C. J. 1306, § 3082; 8 R. C. L. 242, § 242. It has also been held that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Fortson v. Elbert CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Hightower v. HollisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Shamblin v. PennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murphey v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Keyes v. VasalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Crider v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Ford v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Lindsey v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API