Legal Opinion
United States v. James David Nichols, United States of America v. James David Nichols
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 28, 2006No. 04-5020, 04-5021PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge TRAXLER joined.
OPINION
WILLIAM W. WILKINS, Chief Judge.
The United States appeals James David Nichols’ sentence for bank robbery, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (West 2000), arguing that the district court improperly refused to consider at sentencing a statement obtained from Nichols in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). Because the Fifth Amendment does not…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Henry Geovany Hernandez-VillanuevaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Stephen Graham-WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Menzies v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- People v. RoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.