Legal Opinion

Guinzburg v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Julius Joseph, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the cleric of the county of New York on the 15th day of November, 1910.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

Appeal from order denying motion to compel plaintiff to reply to separate defenses.

The allegations of the complaint are that prior to December, 1902, defendant had acquired a considerable block of mining stock, in which plaintiff also acquired an interest; that both parties were anxious to dispose of the stock ; that it was agreed that both parties should try to sell the stock, it being a condition, .however, that plaintiff should be permitted by defendant to make an agreement to indemnify and hold harmless any proposed purchaser against any loss by reason of such purchase; that it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emanuel v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Seamans v. . BarentsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trachtenberg v. Converse & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bleakney v. SchrauffNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Robie v. Fred F. French Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API