Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Gladstone

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 11, 2005No. 130, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

The question before us is whether a plaintiff who (1) sues to recover damages for conduct that might, if properly pled, raise a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, but, (2) fails to plead such a claim, may nonetheless recover attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) if he/she prevails on a State law claim for which an award of.attorneys’ fees is otherwise not permitted. The answer is “no.”

BACKGROUND

In January, 2003, appellants Dewitt Thomas (Thomas) and his wife, Mallissa, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (City), the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Parkway 1046, LLC v. U. S. Home CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Clancy v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Ademiluyi v. Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  5. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API