Legal Opinion
Zagano v. Fordham University
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 1989No. 84 Civ. 8706 (RO)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge:
Dr. Zagano brought this action against Fordham University and others, claiming that Fordham discriminated against her in her academic employment on the basis of her sex and her religion, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Five years after filing the complaint, on the day set for trial, Dr. Zagano moved for voluntary discontinuance without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), giving as her reasons the advanced age and inexperience of her counsel, and her preference for informal, plaintiff-oriented state administrative proceedings, where the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alice Lisa Greenberg, Cross-Appellant, Phyllis Gelman, Susan R. Meredith v. Hilton International Co., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Robert B. Nemeroff, D.D.S., Hale & Dorr v. Alan AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. DASA Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Jackson Marine Corp. v. Harvey Barge Repair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phyllis Zagano v. Fordham University and George N. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In re MJS Las Croabas Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- Del Pino v. At & T Information System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- In re: MJS Las Croabas Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- Sharma v. Duracell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991