Stryker v. Merseles
Supreme Court of New Jersey
This was a motion on part of the sheriff to set aside an amercement entered against him.
1Opinion of the CourtPotts, J.
Upon a judgment entered in this court in September, 1851, by the plaintiff against the defendant, a testatum fi. fa. de bon et ter. was delivered to Merseles, sheriff of Hudson, Nov. 11, 1851, which has been returned with the endorsement, “ There is no goods, chattels, lands, tenements or hereditaments of the defendant in my bailiwick whereon to levy. Dated February 24, 1852. Jacob M. Merseles, sheriff.” The execution was returnable to the term of February, 1852, butin point of factit was not actually returned until June, 1853. Notice of amercement was given to the sheriff in October, 1852,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mickles v. HartCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vitale v. Hotel California, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982