Legal Opinion

Stryker v. Merseles

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a motion on part of the sheriff to set aside an amercement entered against him.

1Opinion of the CourtPotts, J.

Upon a judgment entered in this court in September, 1851, by the plaintiff against the defendant, a testatum fi. fa. de bon et ter. was delivered to Merseles, sheriff of Hudson, Nov. 11, 1851, which has been returned with the endorsement, “ There is no goods, chattels, lands, tenements or hereditaments of the defendant in my bailiwick whereon to levy. Dated February 24, 1852. Jacob M. Merseles, sheriff.” The execution was returnable to the term of February, 1852, butin point of factit was not actually returned until June, 1853. Notice of amercement was given to the sheriff in October, 1852,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mickles v. HartCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vitale v. Hotel California, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API