Legal Opinion

Michael v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 31, 2001No. 3D01-403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1293 CONFESSION OF ERROR

2Per curiam

Based on the state’s confession of error, we reverse defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial. As the state correctly states, defendant’s cause challenge to the objectionable juror should have been granted. The juror expressed that he hoped he could be fair, but that he could not be sure. Uncertainty as to a venireperson’s impartiality must be resolved in favor of the party raising the challenge. James v. State, 731 So.2d 781, 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Montozzi v. State, 633 So.2d 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); see Martinez v. State, 795 So.2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Montozzi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Martinez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API