Commonwealth v. Lozano
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. The following is a summary of some of the evidence introduced by the close of the Commonwealth’s case (see Commonwealth v. Kelley, 370 Mass. 147, 148-149 [1976]) which was sufficient to warrant findings that the defendant had acted in bad faith rather than “for a legitimate medical purpose” (G. L. c. 94C, § 19 [o], as amended by St. 1972, c. 806, § 15) in giving the two undercover officers the six prescriptions for which the defendant stands convicted: the defendant took no medical history from either officer and failed to weigh one of them before giving him prescriptions for weight…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arthurs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. De La CruzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Burke v. GallisonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HogueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. KobrinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.