Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lozano

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 11, 1977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The following is a summary of some of the evidence introduced by the close of the Commonwealth’s case (see Commonwealth v. Kelley, 370 Mass. 147, 148-149 [1976]) which was sufficient to warrant findings that the defendant had acted in bad faith rather than “for a legitimate medical purpose” (G. L. c. 94C, § 19 [o], as amended by St. 1972, c. 806, § 15) in giving the two undercover officers the six prescriptions for which the defendant stands convicted: the defendant took no medical history from either officer and failed to weigh one of them before giving him prescriptions for weight…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arthurs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. De La CruzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  3. Burke v. GallisonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. HogueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. KobrinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API