Legal Opinion
Forgey v. Sutliff
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
Decided December 15, 1825PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On error from the Supreme Court. The action in that court was dower unde nihil habet by the present defendant against the plaintiff in error. And judgment was there for the demandant upon the case, and for the reasons given by the Supreme Court, as reported in 1 Cowen’s Reports, 89 to 97.
1Opinion of the Court
Sanford, Chancellor, and Golden, Senator, delivered opinions here, in which they concurred with the court below, that the demandant took her dower as purchaser within the meaning and construction of the act of 1802, (2 R. L. 542.) And the judgment of the Supreme Court was affirmed by the whole court; except Lynde and Redfield, Senators, who were for reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Burton v. BurtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Jourdan v. HaranThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1888