Legal Opinion
Pace v. Penny
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 1, 1944No. 31298PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
Plaintiff Penny sued to recover damages for breach of contract to accept and pay for a block of oil and gas leases assembled by Penny. The alleged agreement was made orally about September. 11, 1940, and was confirmed by a letter, dated November 12, 1940, and addressed to Penny. The material parts of the letter are as follows:
“This letter is to state that if you get a proper acceptable solid block of five year oil and gas leases on lands in and around Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 4 East, Pontotoc and Garvin Counties, Oklahoma, and if you get all necessary signatures on same and good…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hooper v. CuneoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Moss v. Best Knitting MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Zambakian v. LesonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Ohio Fuel Co. v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Flynn v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas & Duffield Drilling Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964