Legal Opinion

Pace v. Penny

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1944No. 31298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff Penny sued to recover damages for breach of contract to accept and pay for a block of oil and gas leases assembled by Penny. The alleged agreement was made orally about September. 11, 1940, and was confirmed by a letter, dated November 12, 1940, and addressed to Penny. The material parts of the letter are as follows:

“This letter is to state that if you get a proper acceptable solid block of five year oil and gas leases on lands in and around Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 4 East, Pontotoc and Garvin Counties, Oklahoma, and if you get all necessary signatures on same and good…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CuneoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Moss v. Best Knitting MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Zambakian v. LesonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Ohio Fuel Co. v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Flynn v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas & Duffield Drilling Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API