Legal Opinion

Refosco v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1981No. Appeal, No. 782 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

This is the second of three cases consolidated on appeal, which concern the intendment of Section 301 (c)(2) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §411(2). Petitioner, the widow of a coal miner, appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which denied her entitlement to death benefits under Section 301 (c)(2) of the Act. We affirm the Board’s order.

*76Section 301(c)(2) of the Act provides “/t/hat whenever occupational disease is the basis for compensation, ... it shall apply…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Elliott v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Crucible Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Crucible Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Crucible Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API