Legal Opinion

Allith-Prouty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1933No. 21680. Judgment reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Defendant in error, the widow of William Warfield, deceased, was awarded compensation by the Industrial Commission for injuries resulting in his death. The circuit court of Vermilion county confirmed the award. The cause is here on writ of error.

On hearing before the arbitrator it was stipulated that the deceased and plaintiff in error were operating under and subject to the Workmen’s Compensation act. The earnings of deceased were also stipulated, as was his employment by plaintiff in error. The question in dispute was whether the deceased received an accidental injury which arose out of and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. C. E. Peterson & Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Carson-Payson Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Jakub v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hahn v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sonson v. ArbogastIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McLaren v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hoffman v. Consumers Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Grola v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stevens v. Village of DriggsIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API