Legal Opinion

Speigel, Inc. v. Luster

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 26, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPelts, J.

Plaintiff commenced this suit December 12,1946, upon an account over sis years old, the last item being dated June 16, 1939. Defendant pleaded the general statute of limitations of six years. Code sec. 8600. The plea was sustained first by the court of general sessions and later by the circuit court, trying the case without a jury. Plaintiff appealed in error and insists that defendant was absent from this state so as to save the account from the bar of the statute, under Code section 8581, which is in these words:

“If at any time any cause of action shall accrue against any person who shall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Boro v. HidellTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Turcott v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Erkman v. CarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Green v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walgreen Co. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  2. Forest Young v. Jessie May Hicks and Willys Motors, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  3. Vason v. NickeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Edmonsond v. Lakeside Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Stockburger v. RayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API