Legal Opinion

Ramirez Escobar v. Midland Credit Management

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 8, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00819Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOSE RAMIREZ ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, No. 3:18-cv-819 (MPS) v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, Defendant. August 8, 2019 RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, Jose Ramirez Escobar, brings this suit against Defendant, Midland Credit Management (“Midland”), alleging that Midland violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. §§ 1692

et seq. Midland has moved to dismiss Escobar’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18 (hereinafter “SAC”)) for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 22.) For…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API